Unintended Results of a Discontinued Pesticide


Many of you know that I came into the industry in 20002 when I purchased Hearts Pest Management. Several years later, I added Hearts Consulting Group, as a means of offering my skills far beyond our company boundaries.

Since day one, I heard all the cries of old timers who spoke about the various tools of the trade that had been taken away from them in the pursuit of a pest free environment. Exterminators constantly railed against environmentalist for their short sightedness. They said that the pests would overwhelm us and we would have new and more virulant pest presence to solve. Perhaps they were right is some ways.

Now the environmentalists rail against the exterminators for their short sightedness. They said that the pesticides were too harsh and were killing organisms that were not targeted, destroying good organisms and in quantities that have irrepairable consequences. And so too they were right in some ways.

Having watched the industry for the past 10 years, I too have seen pesticides go away. The first was diazinon. Later I saw restrictive labeling for Termidor, but not a full on retraction of the label. This past year, I have seen Fumitoxin go away for residential use – a portion of the market far greater than many people realized.

Strycnine, although not removed, is consequently in short supply as it has become harder to eliminate gophers and those who remain in the gopher sector of the pest market battle for a supply side that could not possibly handle all the business that had been taken up by Fumitoxin. Strycnine is a word that scares many people – perhaps with some justification. Recently, I had to deal with an absurd situation – thankfully recognized by the local Ag. Dept., when a consumer thought she had somehow contracted strynine in the eye indirectly from a dog who was in a yard where one ounce of strycine was placed underground and the soil was turned over by a lawn aerator. Irrational panic has no limits. We had none of this hysteria when using fumitoxin.

Consumer protection advocates may be happy that fumitoxin will not kill another child, as happened in Utah as the result of a foolish, ignorant act of a company that could not train or control it’s applicators properly. The gopher market has not gone away. People want solutions and will turn to other methods. More strycnine means more paranoid consumers complaining about poisoning – whether poisoned or the result of fantastic fears. Certainly, more pets will be poisoned. As much as I sympathize with the desire to save children from another negligent act, I didn’t think that banning fumitoxin residential use was an answer. How could our regulators not recognize the core fact that this had never happened before? Couldn’t the regulators have instituted a state certification program rather than banning the product?

What’s to stop the residential use of fumitoxin going underground? What’s to stop homeowners from using experimental pesticide treatments to solve their gopher issues. In this industry I have learned that people are extremely compulsive to a fault. I often ask, “What will they think of next?”

Even if a ban worked in eliminating the use of a product, we do no justice to our children or our environment unless we examine the indirect consequences of our actions.

Advertisements

6 Responses to Unintended Results of a Discontinued Pesticide

  1. David Cole says:

    This is simply public employees justifying their job! Overall Fumitoxin is much safer (used correctly) than Strychnine could ever be.

  2. Thos003 says:

    It sounds like a typical case of treating a sympton and not the problem. You can take all the aspirin you want to get rid of a headache, but the problem won’t stop until you take your head out of the vise.

    They did the same thing with pyrethroids, they looked at a a situation that may not even be caused by pest control professionals and then restricted the use for pest control professionals, inadvertently increasing the risk of abuse. Tying the hands of professionals will encourage people to take matters into their own hands.

  3. Matt says:

    Gerry Weitz knows his stuff! Best way to keep your property safe is to treat the home and property regularly. Pest Control Software helps the technician know what services you need and dont need. With an ipad or tablet a tech can pull up diagrams of your home and its past services. This will ensure you get the right service everytime. It also helps companys become more efficient, thus keeping your costs low! Safer and Smarter.

  4. When working with pesticides there is always a risk for something bad to happen. I work in the industry and agree that there are some people that are not safe with the products they use. But banning products is not the way to go. Better regulations and consumer educations seems to be a bit less drastic.
    Pest Control Yuba City

  5. I agree that their are some “exterminators” who are just not safe (or effective) with the pesticides they use. The best pest control is pest prevention!

  6. Peter says:

    There are many 50/50 issues in life with arguments for and against. You need logic and practical leadership to guide you through this, and even then will you have people for and against. Many decisions are emotionally motivated and this is where things can go wrong. Thanks for a thought provoking post.

    Peter
    Termite Management

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: